Legal Ethics Essay

I. attorney and Society a. Observations i. consistent to rule 1.03, CPR, iodine defense instruction manifested to the honorable court that he does non wish to postpone the case again, the same having been previously postponed for 4 times already because of the prosecutions failure to present their witness.II. Lawyer and the Legal Profession b. Observations iii. Respect between defense counsels and fiscal iv. promise each other with respect v. Candid and Friendly vi. After auditory sense, counsels for charge approached prosecutor and bid their goodbyes, with laughs, as if they were re whollyy close friends vii. pursuant(predicate) to command 8, fiscal and defense counsel (female), during their direct and cross interrogations, respectively, never utilise offensive language whenever they have objections during the examination of the witnesses.III. Lawyer and Courtsc. Observations viii. Treat military unit with respect ix. No sign of any disgust or slight to Judge Danilo Ga lvez, despite approval of the latter of handgrip of his case. x. Pursuant to 10.03, procedure, in that respect was no showing that any of the lawyers violated any procedural rules of the court. xi. Pursuant to canon 11 and the rules in that locationof, all lawyers punctually appeared at their respective hearings they were all properly attired when they came to court and no offensive or be language were used, especially in one particular case where there was a direct and cross examinations xii. Pursuant to rule 12.07, during the cross examination of attorney of the witness of the fiscal, she never, even for once, harassed the witness. She addressed her questions to him very sedately and respectfully. xiii.IV. Lawyer and Client d. Observations xiv. In one case, the counsel for the defense manifested that if it be okay with the honorable judge and the court that the trial so move because the same has been postponed 4 times already but prosecutor insisted for the postponement and r eassured the court that on the next hearing they will be able to present their witness judge granted postponement, in the sake of justice xv. In another case, the prosecutor objected to the manifestation by the debate counsel to dismiss the case the reason for the proposed dismissal was because the prosecutor was not present at the last hearing the reason for the objection was that the counsel looking to dismiss the case was also absent the previous hearing judge said that both of you have been absent in one of the hearings, in the interest of justice, case will be postponed and will resume.